Mongolia, moral culture and the mythology of nomadism
Keynote address at the UNESCO-IISNC Conference on Nomadic Ethics and International Dialogue
Keywords:
Mongolia, Moral culture, ethics, nomadismAbstract
The figure of The Nomad has long held a special place in the moral mythologies of classical Euroamerican history, typically appearing as exotic members of the supporting cast in the grand story of civilization. In social evolutionist thought Nomadic Society was presented as one of the major divisions of humankind, to be theorised and contrasted with sedentary agriculture and urbanism. Soviet-era Mongolian scholarship, concerned with recognition and respect for a national culture under active construction, appropriated and valorised nomadism as a distinctive national heritage. The notion of ‘nomadic civilization’ (nüüdliin soyol irgenshil) encapsulated the view that, far from being incompatible with civilization, nomadism was a particular type of civilization, of which Mongolia was the most splendid example. By the time of the postsocialist-era revival of ‘national culture’ the concept was already deeply intertwined with notions of the nomadic, and imbued with a virtuous ethical content. ‘Traditional nomadic culture’ (ulamjlalt nüüdliin soyol) and ‘nomadic civilization’ are central subjects in the Ethical Citizen Education (irgenii yos züin bolovsrol) taught in Mongolian schools. However, since the late twentieth century, trends in history, archaeology and postcolonial scholarship have led to a questioning and rethinking of the notions of nomadism, culture and morality inherited from older schools of scholarship. I argue that ‘the nomadic’ can no longer be seen as a defining feature of a fundamentally different social type, but rather as a label applied to livestock-based political economies with many correspondences with agricultural and urban ones. Similarly, rather than approaching culture as an enduring, abstract collective form, we can better conceive of it as an unstable, changing accretion of particular normative projects for the ordering of the social world.
References
Allen, Tim and Eade, John, 1997, ‘Anthropological approaches to ethnicity and conflict in Europe and beyond’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. Vol. 4, No. 3/4: 217-246.
Atwood, Christopher, 1994, ‘National Questions and National Answers in the Chin Revolution, Or, How Do You Say Minzu in Mongolian?’ Indiana. East Asia Working Paper Series on Language and Politics in Modern China 5:37-73.
Banks, Marcus, 1996, Ethnicity: Anthropological Constructions, London: Routledge.
Barth, Fredrik, 1969, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: the social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Beazley, Charles Raymond, ed. 1903, The texts and versions of John De Plano Carpini and William De Rubruquis as printed for the first time by Hakluyt in 1598, together with some shorter pieces. London: London Hakluyt Society, Cambridge University Press, J & C. F. Clay.
Brubaker, Rogers, 2009, ‘Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism,’ Annual Review of Sociology 35:21-42.
Cleaves, Francis, trans. and ed. 1982, The Secret History of the Mongols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, Ronald, 1978, ‘Ethnicity: Problem and Focus in Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 379-403.
de Munck, Victor, and Bennardo, Giovanni, 2019, ‘Disciplining Culture A Sociocognitive Approach,’ Current Anthropology, 60 (2):174-193.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari, 1986, Nomadology: The war machine. New York: Semiotext(e).
Forbath, Ladislaus, 1936, The New Mongolia (as related by Joseph Geleta), Lawrence Wolfe (trans.) London: William Heinemann.
Gellner, Earnest, 1983, Nations and Nationalism, Oxford, Blackwell.
Gibbon, Edward, 1776-1789. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London: Strahan & Cadell.
Gilmour, James, 1883, Among the Mongols, London: The Religious Tract Society.
Gilmour, James, 1893, More About the Mongols, London: The Religious Tract Society.
Hervik, Peter, 2011, The Annoying Difference. The Emergence of Danish Neonationalism, Neoracism, and Populism in the Post-1989 World. New York: Berghahn Books.
Hobsbawm, Eric, 1991, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphrey, Caroline, 1983, Karl Marx Collective: Economy, society and religion in a siberian collective farm, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Humphrey, Caroline, 1987,“The Host and the Guest: 100 Rules of Good Behaviour in Rural Mongolia.” Journal of the Anglo-Mongolian Society 10 (1): 42–53.
Jagchid Sechin and Hyer Paul, 1979, Mongolia's Culture and Society. Boulder Colorado, Westview Press.
Kaplonski, Christopher, 1998, ‘Creating national identity in socialist Mongolia’, Central Asian Survey 17(1), 35-49.
Keane, Webb, 2014 ‘Freedom, reflexivity, and the sheer everydayness of ethics, Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 443-457
Kuper, Adam, 1994, ‘Culture, Identity and the Project of a Cosmopolitan Anthropology,’
Man, New Series, 29 (3): 537-554.
Lattimore, Owen, 1941, Mongol Journeys, London : J. Cape, 1941.
Laclau, Ernesto, 2005, On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Marzluf, Phillip, 2017, Language, Literacy, and Social Change in Mongolia: Traditionalist, Socialist, and Post-Socialist Identities. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Mönkhsaikhan, D. (ed.), 2004, Uul Ovoony San Takhilgyn Sudruud [Sutras for Mountain Oboo Ceremonies) Ulaanbaatar: ARC, World Bank, WWF Publication.
Montesquieu, Charles Louis, 1750 [1748] The Spirit of Law. London: Nourse & Vaillant.
Morgan, Catherine, 2003, Early Greek States Beyond the Polis, Routledge. London & New York.
Ortner Sherry, 1978, Sherpas Through Their Rituals., Cambridge University Press,
Olivova, Lucie, 2005, ‘Tobacco Smoking in Qing China’Asia Major, 18 (1): 225-260
Riasanovsky, Valentin, 1965, Fundamental Principles of Mongol Law, Indiana University Publications, Mouton & Co., The Hague.
Rosenburg, Daniel, 1982, ‘Leaders and Leadership Roles in a Mongolian Collective: Two Cases’, Mongolian Studies, vol 7.
Sneath, David, 1999, ‘Kinship, networks and residence’ in The End of Nomadism? Society, State and the Environment in Inner Asia, by David Sneath and Caroline Humphrey, Durham: Duke University Press: 136-178.
Sneath, David, 2007(a), The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and Misrepresentations of Nomadic Inner Asia, Columbia University Press, New York.
Sneath, David, 2007(b), ‘Ritual Idioms and Spatial Orders: Comparing the rites for Mongolian and Tibetan ‘local deities’ in U. Bulag and H. Diemberger (eds) The Mongol-Tibet Interface: Opening new research terrains in Inner Asia, Brill, Leiden, pp. 135-158.
Stafford, Charles 2010, ‘The Punishment of Ethical Behavior’ in Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action Michael Lambek (ed.) Fordham University Press (pp. 187-206).
Stalin, Joseph, 1970, Marxism and the National Question: The Nation [and] The National Movement [1913]. In Selections from V. 1. Lenin, and J. V. Stalin on National Colonial Question. Calcutta: Calcutta Book House.
Stolpe, Ines, 2008, ‘Display and Performance in Mongolian Cultural Campaigns, ’ in Fernanda Pirie and Toni Huber (eds) Conflict and Social Order in Tibet and Inner Asia, Brill, Leiden: 59-84.
Thompson, E. P., 1991, Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture. London: Merlin Press.
Toynbee, Arnold J. 1946. A study of History. Abridgement of volumes 1–4 by D. C. Somervell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weatherford, Jack, 2016, Genghis Khan and the Quest for God: How the World's Greatest Conqueror Gave Us Religious Freedom, New York: Viking.
Williams, Bernard, 1985, Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolfram, Herwig, 1988, History of the Goths. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Sneath
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
